Comparative analysis of the methods of teaching geography in different types of schools

  • Sándor Rajmond Simonyi Eszterházy Károly University, Institute of Geography and Environmental Sciences
  • Erika Homoki Eszterházy Károly University
Keywords: geography teachers; practical experience and solutions; type of school; attitude

Abstract

As an entrant teacher, it has been a major issue for us to identify the problems and circumstances of teaching geography in various schools. We have been interested in the opinion of teachers about the state of education, their practical experience and solutions. As part of our research, lessons were observed in five different types of schools and semi-structured interviews were conducted with the teachers afterward. We complemented these with an online survey which was filled out by 122 geography teachers throughout the country. A diagnostic measurement and an attitude research took place in the monitored classes, where the sample included 131 people. Mostly close-ended questions were applied where Likert Scale types were significant in order to analyse the results of the survey more efficiently. The results of the diagnostic tests did not indicate significant difference. However; the survey denoted that applying diverse methods results in acquiring a deeper knowledge. Furthermore, not the type of the school, but the personality of the teacher was the most determining in knowledge transfer and student activity during class.

References

Babbie, E. 2003. A társadalomtudományi kutatás gyakorlata. Balassi Kiadó. Budapest. p. 564.
Falus I. (szerk.) 2007. Didaktika. Nemzetei Tankönyv Kiadó. Budapest. p. 550.
Falus I., Ollé J. (2000). Statisztikai módszerek pedagógusok számára. OKKER Kiadó. Budapest. p. 372.
Farsang A. (2011). Földrajztanítás korszerűen. GeoLitera. Szeged. Az információs - Kommunikációs Technológiák (IKT) és a földrajzoktatás 149-155.
Forgó, S. Kis-Tóth L., Hauser Z. (2008). Az oktatás problémáiról. MÉDIAINFORMATIKA A multimédia oktatástechnológiája. EKF LÍCEUM KIADÓ, EGER 2008.
Fűzi B. (2015). Didaktika és oktatásszervezés. Letöltve: https://regi.tankonyvtar.hu/hu
/tartalom/tamop412b2/2013-0002_didaktika/tananyag/00-borito-150604a-halvanysarga-14-Fuzi.Beatrix.html
Homoki E. (2016). Content and educational conditions of geography as a subject reflecting the comparision of some Central European countries. Analele Universitatii Din Oradea Seria Relatii Internationale Si Studii Europene. VIII. pp. 99-112.
Lengyelné Molnár T. (2013). Kutatástervezés. Eszterházy Károly Főiskola. Eger. Az interjú. p. 109-117. http://mek.oszk.hu/14400/14492/pdf/14492.pdf
Merényi Á., Szabó V., Takács A. (Szerk.) (2006). 101 ötlet innovatív tanároknak Jedlik Oktatási Stúdió Bt. https://sites.google.com/site/vzsuzsa/kiemelt-fejlesztesi-terueletek/a-tanulas-tan/oetletek-fejleszto-anyagok/101-oetlet-innovativ-tanaroknak
Rotgans, J., Schmidt, H. (2011). The role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 27 pp. 37-42.
Sutton, R. (2005). Teachers' Emotions and Classroom Effectiveness: Implications from Recent Research. The Clearing House, Vol. 78. No. 5. pp. 229-235.
Published
2020-09-30
How to Cite
Simonyi, S. R., & Homoki, E. (2020). Comparative analysis of the methods of teaching geography in different types of schools. Journal of Applied Technical and Educational Sciences, 10(3), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.24368/jates.v10i3.187
Section
Articles and Studies